News and Analysis
The Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee met over the weekend to hear more testimony on House Bill 6, the nuclear bailout bill, but adjourned without an up-or-down vote on the legislation.
The committee did, however, adopt two minor amendments to the legislation. One amendment, offered by committee Chair Sen. Steve Wilson (R-Maineville), would allow the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) to modify its rules to ensure businesses with multiple meters are not charged for each meter. That change was requested by the commission to address concerns raised by the OMA.
It was evident to Statehouse observers that the failure to pass a new state budget — which is supposed to be passed no later than June 30, as required by the Ohio Constitution — was tied to HB 6, which is the top priority of Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder.
If HB 6 is approved in present form, ratepayers will see higher electricity costs, while Ohio’s energy markets will suffer costly distortion and decreased investment in new generation.
While there is still time, manufacturers should contact their state legislators and tell them NO on the nuke bailout! Make your senator your priority contact. 7/1/2019
Last Friday, a federal report showed that U.S. crude oil production soared to new heights in April, hitting 12.16 million barrels a day. Booming shale production has allowed U.S. oil output to overtake that of Saudi Arabia and Russia, thereby helping to stabilize energy costs for manufacturers and other businesses. Overall, Ohio is currently the 13th leading state for crude oil production, and the fifth largest producer of natural gas. 7/1/2019
The Ohio Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee this week held additional hearings on House Bill 6, the nuclear bailout legislation. Committee Chair Steve Wilson (R-Warren County) unveiled a new version of the bill Wednesday afternoon. The Senate’s substitute version of HB 6 makes a number of improvements to the House-passed bill, including some that were suggested by the OMA.
Most notably, the Senate version installs guardrails around the bailout payments to ensure ratepayer funds are actually needed to maintain power plant operations. For example, unlike House language that authorized an audit only of the “Clean Air Credit” program itself, the Senate bill would require plant owner FirstEnergy Solutions to “promptly and fully” provide “any document, information, data, or other request” from the PUCO or its advisers. Failure to do so would result in suspension of the subsidy.
At this week’s hearing, the OMA provided opponent testimony since the bill would still distort the electricity market in Ohio, and would continue to subject manufacturers to new costs — known and unknown — without providing offsetting benefits. The Senate committee is expected to vote on its version of HB 6 today (June 28) and final passage will likely come Saturday or Sunday.
Look for another update on HB 6 in the July 2 edition of OMA’s Leadership Briefing. 6/27/2019
A panel of OMA members appeared before the Senate Energy & Public Utilities Committee on Tuesday, June 18, to share reasons why House Bill 6 is bad for manufacturers.
OMA Energy Committee Chair Brad Belden, president of Belden Brick Co. of Canton, told senators the bill would directly increase his company’s electricity costs. Belden said, “There are a lot of moving parts in HB 6 and the math is not as simple as some would have us believe. For Belden Brick, we estimate the net direct cost of the Clean Air Program, OVEC subsidies and increased capacity costs — minus the renewable portfolio standard costs — is about $40,000 per year, plus a lot of other blank checks that could dwarf the cost increase I just shared with you.”
David Johnson, CEO of Summitville Tiles in Columbiana County, reminded lawmakers of the importance of deregulating Ohio’s generation segment. The former OMA chairman noted that Ohio started the deregulation process two decades ago, and that it has produced upwards of $3 billion in savings per year for Ohio’s ratepayers.
Anthony Smith, global energy coordinator for Cooper Tire and Rubber in Findlay, highlighted how the bill also provides subsidies for the utility owners of two coal power plants, including one in Indiana. He informed senators that newly updated cost estimates show that under HB 6, ratepayers would be charged an additional $488 million. His testimony included a rebuttal of several myths espoused by bill supporters. 6/18/2019
Testifying against House Bill 6 this week were OMA members (from left) David Johnson of Summitville Tiles, Brad Belden of Belden Brick Co., and Anthony Smith of Cooper Tire and Rubber.
As unbelievable as it sounds, House Bill 6 would create windfall profits for Ohio’s two nuclear plants by as much as $338.5 million per year — or more than $2 billion over the six-year term of HB 6’s “Clean Air Program.”
Electric ratepayers across Ohio would be left holding the bill.
The OMA has produced an independent analysis of the nuclear plants’ potential profitability under HB 6. Read this document to better understand how the bill would create multiple compensation mechanisms for these plants; trigger special treatment of the plants’ capacity revenue; and make changes in wholesale electricity markets to create even more revenue.
Under the guise of “clean air,” this bill is nothing but an audacious money grab. 6/20/2019
We reported last week how a dark money group known as Generation Now has continued its advertising blitz in support of the nuclear bailout bill, all in hopes of convincing state senators to pass the legislation before the summer break. It is expected the Senate could vote soon on HB 6. The OMA remains a strong opponent of the bill, but senators need to hear directly from manufacturers. Call your state senator and tell him/her that your business and household cannot afford to provide more subsidies to electric utilities. (Here is more information on the bill for you to communicate with your senator.) 6/20/2019
A new public poll released this week shows that 7 in 10 Ohio voters are opposed to House Bill 6, the nuclear bailout bill. The opposition is strongly bipartisan with 73% of Republicans, 67% of Democrats, and 73% of independents against the plan. The poll also found:
* 88% of respondents believe that FirstEnergy Solutions should be subject to review of their financial records by the legislature before another vote on the bill.
* 82% of respondents believe the bill would hurt senior citizens and families living on fixed incomes.
* 82% of respondents oppose allowing money from the fund going to help bail out a plant in Indiana.
* 62% of respondents believe new utility costs could hurt manufacturers across the state, also impacting jobs.
Paid for by API Ohio and overseen by The Harris Poll, the survey was conducted from June 7-12 by telephone. It has a sampling error of +/- 3.4%. 6/18/2019
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled Wednesday that customers of FirstEnergy Ohio utilities have been overcharged by hundreds of millions of dollars since 2017. In a 4-3 decision, the Court said the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) improperly authorized the utilities to impose surcharges for grid modernization subsidies, and ordered the charges to be removed immediately.
Click here for a summary of the decision.
An estimated $450 million has already been unlawfully collected from FirstEnergy customers, according to OMA’s energy experts ($204 million in 2017; $168 million in 2018; and $84 million for the first half of 2019). Under current state law, none of this nearly half-billion dollars is refundable to customers.
Fortunately, the foregone costs or savings brought by this week’s legal victory is approximately $84 million — and the Court’s ruling prevents FirstEnergy from possibly collecting another $336 million during 2020-21, had PUCO approved a pending request to extend the surcharge.
The OMA Energy Group led the legal challenge to remove the distribution modernization rider (DMR).
This week’s Court decision comes as FirstEnergy continues to urge lawmakers to include a provision in the state budget (House Bill 166) that would allow its operating companies to keep “significantly excessive profits” rather than issuing refunds to more than a million customers, including manufacturers.
Congrats to the OMA Energy Group legal team on this week’s important legal win. 6/19/2019
OMA Energy Counsel Kim Bojko led the efforts on behalf of the OMA Energy Group to remove the unlawful surcharges imposed on FirstEnergy ratepayers.
State senators this week heard testimony from the sponsors of House Bill 6, the nuclear power plant bailout legislation. Reps. Jamie Callender (R-Concord) and Shane Wilkin (R-Hillsboro) told members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee that HB 6 would result in cleaner air and reduced power costs. Both senators were peppered with questions from concerned lawmakers who correctly exposed that the bill would do nothing to address air pollutants and would actually increase customer costs.
Senators on the panel were equally skeptical of proponent witnesses who came forward in support of handouts for nuclear power and certain coal-fired plants. An OMA analysis shows that the owners (hedge funds) of the nuclear power plants stand to earn a minimum profit of $176 million per year as a result of the subsidy. Interestingly, the beneficiaries did not come forward to offer testimony, instead relying on allies and suppliers to make their plea.
Also this week, Generation Now — a dark money group — has continued its advertising blitz in support of the bailout bill in hopes of swaying senators. It is expected that the Senate could vote on HB 6 in the coming days. The OMA remains a strong opponent of the bill, but senators need to hear directly from manufacturers who will be exposed to new costs. Call your state senator and tell him/her that your business and household cannot afford HB 6. (Here is more information on the bill.) 6/13/2019
The House-passed plan to create ratepayer-funded subsidies for Ohio’s nuclear power plants (House Bill 6) will discourage independent power plant developers from building new electricity generation in the Buckeye State, despite the ongoing shale boom. That’s according to new analysis by energy expert Susanne Buckley, managing partner at Scioto Energy, an OMA Connections Partner.
Buckley says that HB 6 tells potential developers who are considering Ohio: “Beware! The playing field is not level. Participate at your own risk as we favor your competition.”
She adds, “(T)he bottom line is that customers would be forced to subsidize two nuclear plants that are not profitable on their ow by paying them $176 million per year.” At the same time, the bill would “gut” the existing renewable energy and energy efficiency programs. 6/10/2019