Energy Management

Homepage » Communities » Energy Management

News & Analysis Archive


Ohio Utility Partner


AES Ohio logo

Energy Engineering Consulting

Decrease energy usage, increase efficiency, and save money. Click here to see how OMA can help.


Carpenter Lipps


Columbia Gas




DT Midstream


NEXUS Gas Transmission



Vistra Energy

OMA Resources


News and Analysis

Coal-Fired Power Use Grows for First Time Since 2014

October 22, 2021

This year will yield the first year-over-year increase in coal-fired electricity generation in the U.S. since 2014, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Coal-powered generation is projected to rise by 22% over 2020 levels due to higher natural gas prices. Despite this, the EIA forecasts U.S. coal-fired generation will decline about 5% next year due to continued retirements of coal power plants and lower natural gas prices. 10/19/2021

Ohio House Introduces Community Solar Legislation

October 22, 2021

Last week, members of the Ohio House introduced House Bill 450, legislation that would permit community solar in the territories of the electric distribution utilities (EDUs). To date, community solar has not been available in EDU territories due to the inability for customers to participate in aggregate or virtual net metering. For details, see this insight from OMA general counsel Bricker & Eckler. 10/21/2021

Scrutiny of OVEC Subsidy Continues

October 15, 2021

On the heels of a recent AP article, Ohio’s customer-funded subsidy for two coal-fired power plants (one of which is in Indiana) continues to garner media attention. (subscription) has highlighted the mounting expenses triggered by a House Bill 6 provision to help fund Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC), which is comprised of more than a dozen utility companies.

The article cites a recent OMA-supported study that found the OVEC subsidy could cost Ohioans a total of $1.8 billion by 2030. While AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio customers have been funding the subsidy for years, HB 6 mandated that “FirstEnergy customers had to begin paying subsidies for the plants.” 10/11/2021

OMA Joins Effort to Support Competitive Transmission

October 15, 2021

The OMA this week joined more than 70 consumer organizations representing manufacturing companies and residential consumers to urge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to ensure that new electricity transmission projects are competitively bid and ratepayer cost increases are reduced.

FERC, which oversees the U.S. bulk power system, has initiated an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that considers the potential need to improve how transmission lines are planned and paid for. According to the Electricity Transmission Competition Coalition, annual transmission spending in the U.S. has increased from $95 billion in 2014 to $170 billion in 2020 — a 79% increase — while electricity demand increased only 2.3%. Only about 3% of electric transmission projects face competition. 10/14/2021

Study: Ohio No. 25 for Energy Efficiency

October 15, 2021

The Buckeye State ranks 25th when it comes to energy efficiency, according to a new comparison by personal finance website The site measured the efficiency of auto- and home-energy consumption in the 48 contiguous states. 10/12/2021

Report: No Plan to Protect Ohio Customers From Growing Transmission Charges

October 8, 2021

The OMA Energy Group (OMAEG) has worked hard to contain transmission charges — one of three major components on power bills, along with generation and distribution. The OMAEG contends that applications for new transmission charges are not being adequately scrutinized by regulators, resulting in customer cost increases without corresponding benefits. Multiple consumer groups have supported the OMAEG’s efforts on this issue.

The OMAEG proposes that the Ohio Power Siting Board provide greater oversight of charges for supplemental transmission projects. Despite these concerns, the Board recently issued a draft report warning against increased oversight that could significantly reduce costs while maintaining reliability. Not surprisingly, transmission owners generally agree with that position, according to a report by Hannah News Service. 10/7/2021

PUCO Requested Utility-Friendly Edits to Audit Report

October 8, 2021

Emails obtained via a public records request show staff at the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) directed an independent auditor to tone down its initial criticism of customer-funded subsidies for two coal-fired power plants owned by the Ohio Valley Electric Corp. (OVEC).

According to reports, the auditor — who was hired to examine the OVEC subsidies, which are directly tied to the scandal-ridden House Bill 6 — originally stated that “keeping the plants running does not seem to be in the best interests of ratepayers” and “the OVEC contract overall is not in the best interest of AEP Ohio ratepayers.” At the time, the PUCO was headed by former Chair Sam Randazzo, who later resigned due to his apparent ties to the HB 6 scandal. The final audit report contains a much milder tone.

The OMA remains committed to the repeal of these subsidies, which were forced on Ohio manufacturers. 10/7/2021

Industrial Use of Natural Gas Could Soon Break 50-Year-Old Records

October 8, 2021

Based on the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) September outlook, U.S. industrial sector natural gas consumption is expected to rise throughout 2021 and exceed pre-pandemic 2019 levels. The EIA forecasts the growth to continue into 2022, nearing or breaking annual industrial natural gas consumption records set in the early 1970s. 10/5/2021

AP Highlights Effort to Repeal HB 6 Coal Plant Subsidy

October 1, 2021

The AP has spotlighted efforts in the Ohio House and Senate to repeal a House Bill 6-related subsidy for two unprofitable Cold War-era coal plants. The AP story points to OMA research that shows the plants lost $1.3 billion from 2012 through 2019 and continue to lose money.

The subsidy for the Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC) plants — one of multiple reasons the OMA opposed HB 6 — “has cost Ohio customers more than $340 million thus far and leave them on the hook for hundreds of millions more.”

Meanwhile, the House Public Utilities Committee this week held its second hearing on House Bill 351 — the House version of the OVEC subsidy repeal. Kim Bojko, the OMA’s energy counsel, offered proponent testimony. (See Kim’s testimony beginning at the 1:07:30 mark, as well as this story by Gongwer News Service.) 9/29/2021

Analysis: OVEC Costs Double for Customers

October 1, 2021

A new analysis by the OMA’s technical consultants at RunnerStone describes how customers’ costs to subsidize two inefficient, Cold War-era coal power plants (including one in Indiana) have doubled in recent years.

The memo also examines inconsistencies expressed by OVEC and its consortium of energy company owners regarding the need for the subsidy. The OVEC subsidy, which is directly tied to the scandal-ridden House Bill 6, has been consistently opposed by the OMA due to the growing burden it has placed on customers. This new research confirms manufacturers’ concerns. 9/30/2021