Energy Management

Homepage » Communities » Energy Management

News & Analysis Archive

Ohio Utility Partner

 

AES Ohio logo

Engineering Consulting

Decrease energy usage, increase efficiency, and save money. Click here to see how OMA can help.

Partners

Columbia Gas

 

Freepoint Energy


nrg


 


Dynegy

OMA Resources

News and Analysis

OMA Testifies Against AEP Ohio Plan to Charge Customers for New Renewable-Energy Generation

January 11, 2019

The OMA joined forces with other parties last week in filing testimony to oppose AEP Ohio’s proposed renewable energy subsidy.

AEP Ohio has an application pending with state regulators at the PUCO that would require all AEP customers to subsidize a large scale solar-energy generation site.

While the OMA supports ‘all of the above’ forms of energy generation, OMA insists that generation be competitively sourced as envisioned by Ohio’s electricity deregulation law of 1999.

Also filing testimony was the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (OCC), Ohio’s government-appointed residential consumer advocate. OCC testified: “AEP’s regulatory proposal transfers financial and operating risk of power plants from AEP shareholders to AEP Ohio’s captive monopoly customers. This is contrary to the General Assembly’s plan for Ohio that, with limited exceptions, generating plants (including renewable projects) should be developed in the marketplace, without involvement of monopoly utilities and charges to their captive customers.” 1/10/2019

Reject FirstEnergy’s So-Called ‘Distribution Modernization’ Rider!

January 11, 2019

This week, OMA’s energy counsel Kim Bojko of Carpenter Lipps & Leland presented oral argument to the Supreme Court of Ohio urging the court to reject a customer-paid ‘distribution modernization’ rider that the PUCO approved in 2016.

Bojko argued that the PUCO’s decision was in error because the rider was used to shore up FirstEnergy’s finances, not to support grid modernization.

“Don’t let the name fool you. This rider has nothing to do with the distribution service or modernizing the grid,” said Bojko. She emphasized the point, saying, “Not one penny is to be spent on distribution. Instead it is a credit support rider.”

The court’s decision is expected mid- to late 2019. In the meantime customers in FirstEnergy service territory will continue paying this rider, even those who purchase power from a competitive supplier. Customers have already paid approximately $372 million for the first two years of this rider.

This work is supported by the OMA Energy Group; learn more here. 1/10/2019