News and Analysis
The movie “Dark Waters” continues to be exposed for the piece of sensationalism it is. This week, one of the six scientists who wrote a report on the 1999 cattle deaths featured in the movie took issue with the film.
In a letter to the editor, Robert H. Poppenga says the movie perpetuates falsehoods about science to sell movie tickets — noting that his team “concluded there was no evidence that chemical contamination was associated with the cattle’s health problems, which instead resulted from poor nutrition and sub-par veterinary care.” The movie, he says, “ignores scientific studies that are inconvenient to the filmmakers’ narrative.” 1/7/2020
In late 2019, a movie called “Dark Waters” was released by Hollywood activists, and promoted by trial lawyers and anti-manufacturing interests. While the movie has been a box office bust, it has succeeded in its mission of misrepresenting manufacturing in the Ohio River Valley.
The OMA’s Rob Brundrett, director of public policy services, recently reviewed the film at the request of the Ohio State Bar Association. The association’s magazine, Ohio Lawyer, has published his critique.
If you haven’t already seen the OMA’s “Truth About Dark Waters” website — which sets the record straight with fact sheets, videos, and a blog — be sure to do so. 1/2/2020
Andrew O. Smith, CEO of Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. in Columbus, has also penned his thoughts on the movie “Dark Waters” and what he calls “a system of ‘Jackpot Justice’ where trial lawyers and special-interest groups extort huge payouts and regulate manufacturing through litigation.”
In a Jan. 2 guest editorial published in The Columbus Dispatch, Smith wrote: “Lawsuits impose a cost on our country equal to roughly 9.4% of GDP or about $2 trillion annually in dead-weight losses, showing up in higher costs for goods and services to the tune of $6,000 for every man, woman and child in this country, every single year.” 1/2/2020