June 8, 2012

Update:  On June 4, 2012, DP&L filed a motion for continuance of testimony and hearing dates. DP&L argues that the June 13th deadline for submitting intervenor testimony and the June 25th hearing date provides insufficient time to complete settlement discussions. Additionally, DP&L argues that several of the parties in its case are also tied up in the other hearings presently before the PUCO. It is evident that DP&L would prefer to settle this case and we believe that DP&L is attempting to determine whether and how generating assets could be spun off into an affiliate. We will provide additional information regarding this case as it becomes available.