Update: OMAEG and others filed applications for rehearing urging the PUCO to reconsider its rulings that authorized DP&L to withdraw its ESP 2 and partially revert to its ESP 1. OMAEG argued that the rulings were unlawful because they authorized DP&L to blend provisions from its ESP 1 and ESP 2 together, permitted DP&L to resurrect an unlawful stability charge in the form of the Rate Stabilization Charge, and enabled DP&L to effectively override the Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision that invalidated the Service Stability Rider. It is expected that next week DP&L will file a response in opposition to these applications for rehearing.