Update:  This week, the Attorney Examiner issued an entry denying DP&L’s request to set a procedural schedule for its not-yet-filed ESP.  The entry was based upon PUCO rules which require that an application be filed before the PUCO establish a hearing schedule.  Therefore, the PUCO will not set a procedural schedule until DP&L files its ESP application, which DP&L intends to do in the coming weeks.

Also this week, a joint group of intervenors, including the OMAEG, filed a joint motion for the PUCO to affirmatively find that DP&L’s nonbypassable rate stabilization charge expires on December 31, 2012.  The PUCO should soon issue a decision regarding this motion.