Update:  On October 17, 2014, OCC filed an application for rehearing of the Commission’s decision, contending that the Commission’s order was unlawful and unreasonable in the following respects:  (1) failing to approving OCC’s Motion to Intervene; (2) approving DP&L’s fourth amended corporate separation plan without first enabling intervenors to review, through the discovery process, the cost allocation manuals which separate expenses between DP&L and its affiliates; (3) preventing intervenors from demonstrating that a hearing was reasonably required; and (4) approving DP&L’s amended plan based on Staff’s review of the cost allocation manuals and recommendation, which was not included in the record of this proceeding.