Update: OMA Energy Group filed objections to DP&L’s energy efficiency and peak demand reduction (EE/PDR) plan. OMA Energy Group recommended that the PUCO curtail DP&L’s ability to earn a customer-funded shared savings incentive. As one example, OMA Energy Group recommended that there be a cap on the amount of the incentive. OMA Energy Group also urged the PUCO to deny DP&L’s request to implement the proposed Non-Programmatic Savings program because it permits DP&L to earn a profit paid by customers from actions that were taken independently by customers outside of a utility-operated program. The PUCO was further urged by OMA Energy Group to modify DP&L’s PJM capacity bidding plan to provide benefits to customers from offsetting costs with the PJM revenues obtained and from maximizing bidding strategies that will have price suppression effects on the wholesale capacity market.